Should Your Child Have The Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Test?

2 Comments
Join the Conversation
Blood Tests - Public Health Imaging Library
Blood Tests - Public Health Imaging Library
Blood tests for ANAs are rarely needed in children and are not recommended as a screening test for pediatric musculoskeletal pain.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are present in significant titers in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other connective tissue disorders. Their presence serves as a marker of disease and helps doctors diagnose the various connective tissue disorders in adults. According to a review published in Pediatric Rheumatology, the ANA test is greatly overused in children. In addition, positive results do not necessarily indicate that an autoimmune connective tissue disorder is present.

Blood Tests in Children

There are currently no blood markers that can identify risk factors for rheumatic diseases in children the way cholesterol levels are used to show cardiac disease risk in adults. For children with symptoms of arthritis, the C-reactive protein (CRP) test is a nonspecific marker of inflammation and may be beneficial. Otherwise, the blood test for Lyme disease is the only laboratory tests which fits the description of a true diagnostic test for arthritis. For a blood test to serve as a marker of disease, 9 out of 10 individuals with the illness should have positive results, and 9 out of 10 individuals without the disease will have negative results. The ANA test doesn’t have the degree of accuracy to recommend its use in the pediatric population unless patients have specific signs and symptoms of a particular connective tissue disorder, such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis or SLE.

ANA Results and Patterns in Children

False positive ANA results are common. In one study of 138 children with positive ANA results, one-third of the subjects did not have a connective tissue disorder. In a similar study only 55% of the children with a positive ANA test result had an inflammatory rheumatic disease, and typically the titer was greater than 1:640. In a study from the British Columbia’s Children’s Hospital, researchers concluded that an ANA as high as 1:160 in children had little or no diagnostic value. In children found to have connective tissue disorders, the titer was much higher. In children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, the ANA test is more likely to be positive when uveitis is also present.

Children with a positive ANA who didn’t have a rheumatic disorder were not found to have a high risk of developing a rheumatic condition in the future. Although there is evidence that a positive ANA can precede the development of disease in adults by several years, studies showed that positive ANA results in children without a rheumatic disease had less than a 1% risk of developing a rheumatic disease within the next 61 months. However, the researchers noted that a positive ANA was found to precede idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), an autoimmune platelet disorder, in some children.

The study concluded that because of it’s high false positivity rate, the test should be limited to cases in which SLE, mixed connective tissue disease or other conditions are strongly suspected. In these cases, a positive ANA result can be used to confirm the diagnosis. When the test is performed as a screening tool, results below 1:640 should be ignored.

Besides being seen in connective tissue disorders, antinuclear antibodies can also occur in infection, malignancy and as a result of various drugs in conditions of drug-related lupus. In these conditions, symptoms resolve when the offending drug is stopped. Environmental toxins can also cause a positive result.

In their study the researchers found that children with SLE and other connective tissue disorders were more likely to have a homogenous pattern with mitotic staining. Children with results showing a nucleolar pattern of staining were unlikely to have a rheumatic disease.

Source

Petern Malleson, Murray Mackinnon, Michaela Sailer-Hoeck, and Charles Spencer, Review for the Generalist: The antinuclear antibody test in children—when to use it and what to do with a positive result, Pediatric Rheumatology, October, 2010.

Elaine at NYC Best of Reference Library Awards, Lisa Moore

Elaine Moore - I'm a retired medical technologist and medical writer with more than 30 years experience working in hospital laboratories. Currently, I ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 5+3?

Comments

Feb 2, 2012 6:23 AM
Guest :
Yes, I believe that ANA testing could be helpful is some cases. For example: I have been sick most of my life. At a very young age I had serious stomach and gastrointestinal problems. It was usually attributed to a "nervous stomach" (regardless if I was upset or discontent over anything other than being sick all the time) and I was labeled as "high strung". Not, uncommon in women with hard to diagnose illnesses, and Heaven forbid it's a child with these problems.

When I became pregnant at the age of 26 I was in the hospital twice and in the bed sick almost the whole eight months. Yes, I said eight month because my son was born early and was in NICU for the first two weeks of his life with respiratory difficulties. His fetal breathing system did not shut down. I have since learned this is common with Sjogren's patients (which I have) bearing children and in fact have spoken to several who have had miscarriages attributed to Sjogren's. This would have been helpful information to have had beforehand.

At the age of 28 (1982) I had my first bout of non-smoking lung cancer and a portion of my right lung was removed. (Sjogren's can affect the lungs along with other organs...it is more than dry eyes and dry mouth!) I had never smoked nor lived with smokers. In the early 1990s I was diagnosed with Raynaud's syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia and Sjogren's syndrome. Had an ANA test been done at an earlier age, it might have shown I was predisposed or already in the early stages of Sjogren's because you see, one Sjogren's complications is a condition called gastroparesis which is what I have and have had all of my life. It is low motility of the gastrointestinal system.

Since my diagnosis of Sjogren's I have gone through another bout of non-smoking lung cancer (1995) in which 60% of my left lung was removed, went through menopause in my 30s (one study suggests that women with Sjogren's are post menopausal, they just don't know if menopause triggers Sjogren's or Sjogren's triggers an early menopause), I have also developed peripheral neuropathy, hypothyroidism and a laundry list of other health problems.

I can't help but believe if I had knowledge at an earlier age my life and medical treatment would have been much different and in some cases better. Advance warning is ALWAYS helpful!
Feb 11, 2012 11:34 AM
Guest :
I, too, believe in the importance of early testing. I find it interesting that the study cited is one from B.C.'s Children's Hospital. This is the institution my daughter was hospitalized in back in 1995 when she presented with the classic symptoms of severe lupus. They failed to diagnose her correctly, instead choosing a psychiatric diagnosis for her inability to digest food.

She went on to develop CIDP, Hashimoto's Disease, Myasthenia Gravis, POTS, neuropathy - well, you get the idea.

She died of liver failure in August of 2011. Had she been adequately evaluated at the outset, her outcome might have ben quite different. Aggressive and objective evaluation must become the norm when confronting pediatric cases that present in this way. As the guest poster previous stated: Advance warning is ALWAYS helpful.
2 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement